From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halo Wireless, Inc. v. Tenn. Regulatory Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Sep 26, 2012
NO. 3-12-0680 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 26, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3-12-0680

09-26-2012

HALO WIRELESS, INC. v. TENNESSEE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 22) and Objections filed by a Non-Party, Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc. (Docket No. 23).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Non-Party are well-taken, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Plaintiff Halo Wireless, Inc. for failure to prosecute. Nothing about this ruling shall bind or be dispositive of the rights of Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc. in Case No. 3-12-0679.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Halo Wireless, Inc. v. Tenn. Regulatory Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Sep 26, 2012
NO. 3-12-0680 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Halo Wireless, Inc. v. Tenn. Regulatory Auth.

Case Details

Full title:HALO WIRELESS, INC. v. TENNESSEE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Sep 26, 2012

Citations

NO. 3-12-0680 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 26, 2012)