From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halmar Corp. Defoe Corp. v. Hudson Found

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 1995
212 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 6, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

For the reasons stated in Halmar Corp. v. Hudson Founds. ( 212 A.D.2d 505 [decided herewith]) the Supreme Court properly denied the motion of Jablonski Mead Associates, Inc., to dismiss the sixth cause of action for negligent misrepresentation insofar as it is asserted against it. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Copertino and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Halmar Corp. Defoe Corp. v. Hudson Found

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 1995
212 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Halmar Corp. Defoe Corp. v. Hudson Found

Case Details

Full title:HALMAR CORPORATION DEFOE CORP., Respondent, v. HUDSON FOUNDATIONS, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 6, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 112

Citing Cases

Pomarc Associates v. Beach Concerts

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or…