From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hallmark Constr. v. Suffolk County Water Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 1957
4 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

November 6, 1957


In this action for rescission of a contract, the defendant appeals from an order denying a motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice upon the ground that the pleading on its face fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The plaintiff failed during two terms of this court to file points in support of its contention, although the appeal was adjourned for that very purpose. In this situation, we are unaware of the legal basis for plaintiff's allegations. Accordingly, the order is unanimously reversed and the complaint dismissed for insufficiency, with leave to replead. Settle order on notice.

Concur — Peck, P.J., Botein, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Hallmark Constr. v. Suffolk County Water Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 1957
4 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

Hallmark Constr. v. Suffolk County Water Auth

Case Details

Full title:HALLMARK CONSTRUCTION CORP., Respondent, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1957

Citations

4 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)