From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halliday v. Spjute

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2013
CIV F-07-0620 AWI GSA (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2013)

Opinion

CIV F-07-0620 AWI GSA

01-09-2013

GLEN HALLIDAY, MICHAEL S. IOANE, SR., SHELLY IAONE, ASHLEY M. IOANE, MICHAEL S. IOANE, JR., Plaintiffs, v. KENT R. SPJUTE, JEAN NOLE, JEFF HODGES, BRIAN APPLEGATE, MICHELLE M. CASAREZ, UNKNOWN DOES 1-20, AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.


ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE OF JANUARY 14, 2013 AND

TAKING MATTER UNDER SUBMISSION

Defendants have made a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Doc. 131. Plaintiffs termed their opposition, a "Notice of Cross Motion to Stay and Opposition to Motion to Dismiss." Doc. 141. Defendants then filed a timely reply. Doc. 142. The court has reviewed the papers filed and has determined that the motion to dismiss/summary judgment is suitable for decision without further oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Regarding Plaintiffs' request for a stay, Judge Austen has recently denied their separate motion for a stay. Doc. 138. Trying to obtain a stay through the briefing of this motion is inappropriate and the court will not consider the request.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of January 14, 2013, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of that date, the court will take the matter under submission and will thereafter issue its decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Halliday v. Spjute

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2013
CIV F-07-0620 AWI GSA (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Halliday v. Spjute

Case Details

Full title:GLEN HALLIDAY, MICHAEL S. IOANE, SR., SHELLY IAONE, ASHLEY M. IOANE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2013

Citations

CIV F-07-0620 AWI GSA (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2013)