From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Wyeth, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 2, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-738 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 2, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-738.

December 2, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Certification for Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), and the lack of any response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion (Docket No. 23) is GRANTED, and that this Court's order of September 30, 2010, D.E. 21, 22, is certified for interlocutory appeal.

The Court certifies the following question as a controlling question of law, as to which there is a difference of opinion, and as to which an immediate appeal will expedite the resolution of the litigation:

Does federal law preempt Michigan law which grants immunity to drug manufacturers in actions involving drugs approved by the FDA unless the Defendants engaged in fraud during the application process?


Summaries of

Hall v. Wyeth, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 2, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-738 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Hall v. Wyeth, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JANE HALL, Plaintiff, v. WYETH, INC., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 2, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-738 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 2, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States ex rel. Nevyas v. Allergan, Inc.

The burden is on the party seeking certification to demonstrate "exceptional circumstances justify a…

Cuttic v. Crozer-Chester Med. Ctr.

Thus, “a non-final order may only be certified for interlocutory appeal if the court determines that it: (1)…