From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Oct 25, 2011
CIV-10-444-FHS (E.D. Okla. Oct. 25, 2011)

Opinion

CIV-10-444-FHS

10-25-2011

RAY HALL, individually and as the widower of BETTY JEAN HALL, JOQULYN HALL, RACHEL HALL, DENTEA HALL, LAWANDA HALL, CRYSTAL HALL and ANGELA SMITH, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM J. HARRISON, D.O., and McCURTAIN MEMORIAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, INC., d/b/a McCURTAIN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendants.


Before the court for its consideration is Defendants' Joint Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support (Doc. 80). The court finds there are genuine issues of material fact as to the proximate cause of plaintiff's injury. As a result, summary judgment is therefore inappropriate and said motion should be overruled as to these issues. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; see, e.g., Celotex Corporation v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 106 S.Ct. 2505 (1986).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2011.

Frank H. Seay

United States District Judge

Eastern District of Oklahoma


Summaries of

Hall v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Oct 25, 2011
CIV-10-444-FHS (E.D. Okla. Oct. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Hall v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RAY HALL, individually and as the widower of BETTY JEAN HALL, JOQULYN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

CIV-10-444-FHS (E.D. Okla. Oct. 25, 2011)