From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 28, 1942
157 S.W.2d 906 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942)

Opinion

No. 21783.

Delivered December 10, 1941. Rehearing Denied (Without Written Opinion) January 28, 1942.

Forged Instrument (Passing of) — Affirmance.

Where the indictment properly charged the offense, record contained no bills of exception, and the evidence was deemed sufficient to support the conviction, the conviction was affirmed.

Appeal from District Court of Smith County. Hon. Bascom Gist, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for passing forged instrument; penalty, confinement in penitentiary for two years.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Nat Gentry, Jr., of Tyler, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Appellant was convicted of passing a forged instrument, and his punishment assessed at two years' confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment properly charges the offense. The record contains no bills of exception. The evidence is deemed sufficient to support the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Hall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 28, 1942
157 S.W.2d 906 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942)
Case details for

Hall v. State

Case Details

Full title:O. L. HALL v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 28, 1942

Citations

157 S.W.2d 906 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942)
157 S.W.2d 906