From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 4, 1968
161 S.E.2d 374 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

43439.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 7, 1968.

DECIDED APRIL 4, 1968. REHEARING DENIED APRIL 19, 1968.

Burglary. Muscogee Superior Court. Before Judge Land.

George G. Finch, for appellant.

W. B. Skipworth, Jr., Solicitor General, Frank K. Martin, for appellee.


1. The brief filed by the appellant in this case, except as to the general grounds of the motion for new trial, does not meet the requirements of Rule 17 (a) (1) and Rule 17 (c) (3) (A) and Rule 17 (c) (3) (B) of this court adopted by it on July 21, 1965, and effective August 1, 1965, in that there is no citation or reference to the record or transcript. Accordingly, under the decisions of the court in Strickland v. English, 115 Ga. App. 384 (2) ( 154 S.E.2d 710) and Crider v. State of Ga., 115 Ga. App. 347 (1) ( 154 S.E.2d 743), the enumerations of error for which there is no reference made in either the enumeration or the brief will be considered as abandoned.

2. There was sufficient evidence to corroborate the testimony of the accomplices that the defendant here participated in the burglary for which he was charged and convicted.

Judgment affirmed. Jordan, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 7, 1968 — DECIDED APRIL 4, 1968 — REHEARING DENIED APRIL 19, 1968 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Hall v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 4, 1968
161 S.E.2d 374 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Hall v. State

Case Details

Full title:HALL v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 4, 1968

Citations

161 S.E.2d 374 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
117 Ga. App. 649

Citing Cases

Sturgis v. State

We deem this complaint to be abandoned by reason of the failure to properly argue this enumeration of error…

Jester v. State

(3) In refusing to grant the defendant a new trial. 1. Every appellant is required to assist the appellate…