Hall v. Rogers

Full title: Mark and Kelly Hall v. Randy and Melinda Rogers

Court: COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Aug 13, 2019

Cause number: 01-19-00408-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 13, 2019)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-19-00408-CV

08-13-2019

Mark and Kelly Hall v. Randy and Melinda Rogers

Laura C. Higley

ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motion: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief Party filing motion: Appellants Mark and Kelly Hall Document to be filed: N/A If motion to extend time:

Original due date: N/A

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: N/A

Date Requested: September 23, 2019

Ordered that motion is:

[ ] Granted in part

[v] Denied (without prejudice)

[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

[v] Other: __________

Although the reporter's record was filed on July 23, 2019, the clerk's record has not yet been filed and the district clerk is set to respond to the Clerk of this Court's July 22, 2019 notice by August 21, 2019. Accordingly, appellants' motion for extension of time to file brief is denied without prejudice to refiling after the clerk's record is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (stating that appellant's brief will be due 30 days after later of filing of clerk's or reporter's record).

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

[v] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: August 13, 2019 November 7, 2008 Revision