From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HALL v. PATE

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Nov 16, 2007
Case No. 2:07-cv-0766-WKW (M.D. Ala. Nov. 16, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-cv-0766-WKW.

November 16, 2007


ORDER


On October 15, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 12) in this case to which the plaintiff filed a timely objection. (Doc. # 13.) Upon an independent and de novo review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 12) is ADOPTED;
2. The plaintiff's objection (Doc. # 13) is OVERRULED;
3. Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE prior to service of process in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii), and (iii);
4. To the extent the plaintiff presents claims challenging the constitutionality of criminal charges pending against him before the Circuit Court of Elmore County, Alabama, these claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);
5. This case is DISMISSED.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.


Summaries of

HALL v. PATE

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Nov 16, 2007
Case No. 2:07-cv-0766-WKW (M.D. Ala. Nov. 16, 2007)
Case details for

HALL v. PATE

Case Details

Full title:KENTON M. HALL, Plaintiff, v. MONICA PATE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Nov 16, 2007

Citations

Case No. 2:07-cv-0766-WKW (M.D. Ala. Nov. 16, 2007)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Dixon

By themselves, these allegations for an inadequate investigation impinge upon no constitutional right. Hall…