From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. New York, Chicago St. Louis R.R. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1907
119 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)

Opinion

May, 1907.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P.J., who dissented and voted for reversal on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, as matter of law ( Fiddler v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co., 64 App. Div. 95; Fealey v. Bull, 163 N.Y. 397; Culhane v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co., 60 id. 133; Rich v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 112 App. Div. 818), and also on the ground that the finding of the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence which was the proximate cause of the accident was contrary to and against the weight of the evidence, and Robson, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Hall v. New York, Chicago St. Louis R.R. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1907
119 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for

Hall v. New York, Chicago St. Louis R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:George Hall, Respondent, v. The New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1907

Citations

119 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)