From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Mooretown Rancheria/Feather Falls Casino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 6, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-1856 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-1856 LKK GGH PS

03-06-2013

JEANNE M. HALL, Plaintiff, v. MOORETOWN RANCHERIA/FEATHER FALLS CASINO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

A motion to dismiss filed by defendants Mooretown Rancheria/Feather Falls Casino, Archuleta, McKinley, and Rasmussen presently is calendared for hearing on March 14, 2013. Having reviewed the record, the court has determined that oral argument would not be of material assistance in determining the pending motion. Accordingly, the court will not entertain oral argument, and will determine the motion on the record, including the briefing in support of the pending motion. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The March 14, 2013 hearing on the motion to dismiss, filed February 4, 2013, is vacated; and

2. The motion is submitted on the record.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hall v. Mooretown Rancheria/Feather Falls Casino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 6, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-1856 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Hall v. Mooretown Rancheria/Feather Falls Casino

Case Details

Full title:JEANNE M. HALL, Plaintiff, v. MOORETOWN RANCHERIA/FEATHER FALLS CASINO, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-1856 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)