From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. California

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 3, 2023
2:22-cv-1722 DJC CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1722 DJC CKD P

08-03-2023

ANDREW HOWARD HALL, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On June 14, 2023, the court ordered petitioner to file an opposition to a pending motion to dismiss. Petitioner indicates he has not received a copy of the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within five days, respondent shall serve a copy of the pending motion to dismiss on petitioner's address of record and file a certificate of service with the court. Petitioner shall file a response to the motion to dismiss within 30 days of service. Failure to file a response to the motion to dismiss will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Hall v. California

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 3, 2023
2:22-cv-1722 DJC CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Hall v. California

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW HOWARD HALL, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 3, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-1722 DJC CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2023)