From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Bowser

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 2, 2009
Case No. 2:09-cv-830 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 2, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-830.

December 2, 2009


ORDER


On October 26, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued an Initial Screening Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for failure to satisfy Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). The Magistrate Judge also found that Plaintiff's claims were barred by the doctrine of res judicata, having been previously filed and dismissed by Judge Dlott in Ernest Hall v. Nurse V, et al., Case No. 1:09-cv-381.

Although Plaintiff was advised of his right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation and advised of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed within the time allotted. The Court therefore ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) and DISMISSES the above-captioned case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hall v. Bowser

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 2, 2009
Case No. 2:09-cv-830 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Hall v. Bowser

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST HALL, Plaintiff, v. DR. BOWSER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Dec 2, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-830 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 2, 2009)