From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Mar 11, 2009
Case No. 2:08-cv-00384 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 11, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-00384.

March 11, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's January 26, 2009 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, determines that there is substantial evidence of record supporting the administrative law judge's determination that plaintiff Hall is not disabled within the meaning of the Act.

Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT for defendant.

This action is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Hall v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Mar 11, 2009
Case No. 2:08-cv-00384 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 11, 2009)
Case details for

Hall v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Duane K. Hall, Plaintiff v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 11, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:08-cv-00384 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 11, 2009)