Opinion
No. 2:14-cv-1827 AC P
01-26-2015
J. DOUGLAS HALFORD, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE, Respondent.
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Petitioner, a state prisoner at California Medical Facility, has filed a document styled as a "motion" seeking an extension of time to file an application for writ of habeas corpus. On August 12, 2014, the court granted petitioner 30 days to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus, or suffer dismissal of this matter. The same day, the Clerk of the Court sent petitioner the court's form for filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and the application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner.
Petitioner has not filed a petition nor given any explanation for his failure to do so.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign a district court judge to this case.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: January 26, 2015
/s/_________
ALLISON CLAIRE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE