From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haley v. Milam

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 13, 1958
100 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

Opinion

No. A-47.

February 13, 1958.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, W.A. Stanly, J.

James I. Riley, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Walter G. Arnold, Jacksonville, for appellee.


Upon consideration of motion to quash the appeal on the ground that it is an attempted appeal from an order of the trial court denying appellant's motion for a new trial, which order is not a final judgment within the terms of Section 59.02(1), Florida Statutes 1955, F.S.A., and it appearing from the record that the facts stated in the motion are correct and that this cause is not within the exceptions found in Section 59.03, 59.04, or 59.05, Florida Statutes 1955, F.S.A., it follows that this court does not have jurisdiction of such attempted appeal and the same is hereby quashed upon the authority of Henderson v. Stevens, 157 Fla. 641, 26 So.2d 656.

STURGIS, C.J., WIGGINTON, J., and WILLIS, Ben C., A.J., concur.


Summaries of

Haley v. Milam

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 13, 1958
100 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)
Case details for

Haley v. Milam

Case Details

Full title:CHARICLE M. HALEY, APPELLANT, v. ARTHUR W. MILAM, AS ADMINISTRATOR CUM…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 13, 1958

Citations

100 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

Citing Cases

Greyhound Corporation v. Carswell

The orders to which the notice of appeal herein is directed are not appealable. It is apparent, therefore,…