From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. Hardage

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 19, 1960
112 S.E.2d 775 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)

Opinion

38033.

DECIDED JANUARY 19, 1960.

Appellate procedure. Muscogee Superior Court. Before Judge Thompson. September 22, 1959.

E. B. Cartledge, Jr., John W. Denney, for plaintiff in error.

Swift, Pease, Davidson Chapman, contra.


Mrs. Doris J. Hale sued J. C. Hardage, trading as Crystal Cleaning Service. The defendant demurred to the petition, the plaintiff filed an amendment, and the defendant renewed his demurrers. Thereafter, on September 22, 1959, the trial court rendered a judgment sustaining the defendant's general demurrer but allowed the plaintiff time in which to amend. The only judgment excepted to was the judgment above referred to, and while the writ of error states that no further amendment was filed by the plaintiff it is not shown that a final judgment was rendered after the time allowed the plaintiff to amend had expired. Held:

"`Where it does not appear from the record that the trial court has rendered a judgment on the sufficiency of the pleadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment and where there is no assignment of error on any such subsequent order, the writ of error is premature and must be dismissed by this court. Weinstein v. Rothberg, 87 Ga. App. 94, 97 ( 73 S.E.2d 106).' Motels, Inc. v. Shadrick, 96 Ga. App. 464, 465 ( 100 S.E.2d 592)." Levy v. Logan, 98 Ga. App. 584 (1) ( 106 S.E.2d 185); Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. McLendon, 95 Ga. App. 601 ( 98 S.E.2d 195). Accordingly, the writ of error in the present case must be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed. Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

DECIDED JANUARY 19, 1960.


Summaries of

Hale v. Hardage

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 19, 1960
112 S.E.2d 775 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)
Case details for

Hale v. Hardage

Case Details

Full title:HALE v. HARDAGE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 19, 1960

Citations

112 S.E.2d 775 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)
112 S.E.2d 775