From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 5, 1967
29 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

December 5, 1967


Judgment dismissing the plaintiff's cause of action at the close of the plaintiff's case, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The evidence in this case relating to the condition of the steps in question is exceedingly meager. All we have are such conclusory, descriptive adjectives as "worn", "smooth", "slippery". Accordingly, although on the record before us we can do no other but affirm, we would note that the facts in Kline v. Abraham ( 178 N.Y. 377) are quite distinguishable from those in this case; and Mitcheltree v. Stair ( 135 App. Div. 210 [1st Dept.]), should not necessarily be followed. These cases do not preclude liability under comparable circumstances, where danger, not voluntarily assumed and due to negligent maintenance, is properly demonstrated.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Eager, Capozzoli, McGivern and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Hale v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 5, 1967
29 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Hale v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:LA VERNA HALE, Appellant, v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 5, 1967

Citations

29 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)