From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1937
251 App. Div. 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

June 7, 1937.


Order granting respondent's application for an order directing the police department to furnish to respondent a copy of the police blotter report of an automobile accident reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the application denied, with ten dollars costs. The statutes do not require the furnishing of a copy of the police blotter to a petitioner without the consent of the police commissioner. ( Matter of Rippner, N.Y.L.J. June 20, 1935, p. 3185, and cases cited therein: Jahnke v. City of New York, Id. Oct. 10, 1936, p. 1120; Riker v. City of New York, Id. Nov. 25, 1935, p. 2056.) The records of the police department of the city of New York are not public records within the contemplation of section 51 Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law. They are specifically exempted from the provisions of section 1545 of the Greater New York Charter that are applicable to other departments. Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hale v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1937
251 App. Div. 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Hale v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MARY HALE, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1937

Citations

251 App. Div. 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

Yude v. Cruise

February 24, 1941. Order denying appellant's application for a subpoena duces tecum directing the police…

Matter of Werfel v. Fitzgerald

n the office of * * * any officer, board or commission acting for or on behalf of any county, town, village…