From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halawani v. Caruso

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Apr 15, 2009
Case No. 2:07-cv-233 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 15, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-cv-233.

April 15, 2009


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 18, 2009, this Court issued an order granting defendants' motion for enlargement of time. Plaintiff's copy of the order was returned to this Court as undeliverable, indicating that plaintiff had been paroled and had left no forwarding address. Plaintiff has failed to keep this Court apprised of his current address. Therefore, it is recommended that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed in its entirety, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b), for failure to prosecute. See Catz v. Chalker, 142 F.3d 279, 286 (6th Cir. 1998); Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1991); Buck v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 960 F.2d 603 (6th Cir. 1992).

NOTICE TO PARTIES: Objections to this Report and Recommendation must be served on opposing parties and filed with the Clerk of the Court within ten (10) days of receipt of this Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); W.D. Mich. LCivR 72.3. Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of any further right to appeal. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). See also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).


Summaries of

Halawani v. Caruso

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Apr 15, 2009
Case No. 2:07-cv-233 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 15, 2009)
Case details for

Halawani v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:MIKE Y. HALAWANI, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA L. CARUSO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Apr 15, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:07-cv-233 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 15, 2009)