From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hakmat v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-1219 DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-1219 DAD

03-07-2013

MUHAMMAD S. HAKMAT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

On September 7, 2012, the court granted plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and directed plaintiff to submit documents to the United States Marshal, within fourteen days, for service of process. Plaintiff was ordered to file with the court a statement indicating the date on which the documents were submitted to the United States Marshal within five days of submitting those documents. The combined nineteen-day time period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed the required statement.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause in writing within ten days why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to file a timely response will result in dismissal of this action.

___________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hakmat v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-1219 DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Hakmat v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MUHAMMAD S. HAKMAT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-1219 DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)