From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hakimi v. Servicing Mortg. Servicing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 1, 2017
Case No. 2:16-cv-02303-APG-CWH (D. Nev. Feb. 1, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-cv-02303-APG-CWH

02-01-2017

IMAN HAKIMI, Plaintiff, v. SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, Defendant.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

(Dkt. No. 3)

On January 5, 2017, Magistrate Judge Hoffman entered a report and recommendation that I dismiss the plaintiff's complaint without prejudice because the plaintiff appears to have abandoned the case. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff Iman Hakimi did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Hoffman's report and recommendation (ECF No. 3) is accepted. The plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

DATED this 1st day of February, 2017.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hakimi v. Servicing Mortg. Servicing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 1, 2017
Case No. 2:16-cv-02303-APG-CWH (D. Nev. Feb. 1, 2017)
Case details for

Hakimi v. Servicing Mortg. Servicing

Case Details

Full title:IMAN HAKIMI, Plaintiff, v. SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 1, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:16-cv-02303-APG-CWH (D. Nev. Feb. 1, 2017)