From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hakala v. Travelers

City Court. New York County
Feb 25, 2009
22 Misc. 3d 1126 (N.Y. City Ct. 2009)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Hakala v. Travelers citing Gilbert Frank Corporation v. Federal Insurance Company, supra, the court held that "the Plaintiff failed to prove that the Defendant should be estopped from asserting a statute of limitations defense because he was intentionally lulled into refraining from commencing the lawsuit within the two-year limitation period.

Summary of this case from Myski v. City of New York
See 1 Summary

Opinion

February 25, 2009.

Mendez, J.

Limitation of Actions — Contractual Limitations Period — Waiver., Insurance Law — § 3404 (Fire insurance contracts; standard policy provisions; permissible variations).

Summaries of

Hakala v. Travelers

City Court. New York County
Feb 25, 2009
22 Misc. 3d 1126 (N.Y. City Ct. 2009)

In Hakala v. Travelers citing Gilbert Frank Corporation v. Federal Insurance Company, supra, the court held that "the Plaintiff failed to prove that the Defendant should be estopped from asserting a statute of limitations defense because he was intentionally lulled into refraining from commencing the lawsuit within the two-year limitation period.

Summary of this case from Myski v. City of New York
Case details for

Hakala v. Travelers

Case Details

Full title:Hakala v. Travelers

Court:City Court. New York County

Date published: Feb 25, 2009

Citations

22 Misc. 3d 1126 (N.Y. City Ct. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 50302

Citing Cases

Myski v. City of New York

"Statutes of limitations have been held to provide an important public policy of 'giving repose to human…

1 Citing Cases