From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haithcox v. Greiner

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 20, 2008
Case No. 06-11756 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 20, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 06-11756.

August 20, 2008


ORDER


Before the Court is Plaintiff's Explanation of the Conflict of Interest [#68] regarding the Pro Bono representation assigned by this Court on January 08, 2007. The Court has also reviewed Pro Bono Counsel Abraham Singer's letter in response. It is the Court's determination after reviewing the aforesaid documents that both parties would be mutually served by allowing Counsel to withdraw from the Pro Bono representation of Plaintiff.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the firm of Pepper Hamilton and Abraham Singer shall be allowed to withdraw as Pro Bono counsel for the Plaintiff and the Order of Assignment dated January 08, 2007 [#27] is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Haithcox v. Greiner

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 20, 2008
Case No. 06-11756 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Haithcox v. Greiner

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY C. HAITHCOX #207322, Plaintiff, v. MARY GREINER, M.D., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 20, 2008

Citations

Case No. 06-11756 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 20, 2008)