Haigler v. South Carolina Dep't of Corr.

Full title: Derrick Haigler, Appellant, v. South Carolina Department of Corrections…

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 29, 2012

Appellate Case No. 2011-200266 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-200266 Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-497

08-29-2012

Derrick Haigler, Appellant, v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Derrick Haigler, pro se. Christopher D. Florian, of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From The Administrative Law Court

Carolyn C. Matthews, Administrative Law Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Derrick Haigler, pro se.

Christopher D. Florian, of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Affirmed¹ pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Al-Shabazz v. State, 338 S.C. 354, 379, 527 S.E.2d 742, 755 (2000) (noting an appellate court's review of the Administrative Law Court's (ALC) decision must be confined to the record); ALC Rule 60(A) ("Unless otherwise ordered, the party first noticing the appeal shall file an original brief within sixty-five (65) days after the date of assignment."); ALC Rule 62 ("Upon motion of any party, or on its own motion, an [ALC] may dismiss an appeal for failure to comply with any of the rules of procedure for appeals . . . .").

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.