From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hagamaker v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 13, 1926
108 So. 262 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)

Opinion

8 Div. 317.

April 13, 1926.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Limestone County; O. Kyle, Judge.

Oscar Hagamaker was convicted of violating the game laws, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

R. B. Patton, of Athens, for appellant.

There is no information of complaint filed by the solicitor, and the cause must be reversed. Moss v. State, 42 Ala. 546; Courson v. State, 93 So. 223, 18 Ala. App. 538; Hall v. State, 95 So. 904, 19 Ala. App. 178; Hawkins v. State, 101 So. 514, 20 Ala. App. 285.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Robt. G. Tate, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

A transcript from the justice court is sufficient to give the circuit court jurisdiction. Code 1923, § 3839.


In the absence of a complaint filed by the solicitor as required by section 3843 of the Code of 1923, or of a waiver by the defendant affirmatively appearing of record, the judgment in this case must be reversed. Owens v. State, 99 So. 155, 19 Ala. App. 573.

As this case must be reversed upon the ground above set forth, it is perhaps not necessary for this court to go further into a consideration of the questions presented; but for the guidance of the court upon another trial, if the evidence should remain the same as is disclosed by this record, the state will not have met the burden of proof as to this defendant, whatever may be the case as to Thomas and Newby, who were in a separate automobile and against whom there is additional evidence.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Hagamaker v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 13, 1926
108 So. 262 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
Case details for

Hagamaker v. State

Case Details

Full title:HAGAMAKER v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 13, 1926

Citations

108 So. 262 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
21 Ala. App. 345

Citing Cases

Windham v. State

This was required, as directed by Sec. 363, Title 15, Code 1940, before the enactment in 1935 of Sec. 60, Act…

Seaman v. State

Where it appears from the record that defendant was put to trial in the circuit court upon the original…