From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haffner v. Commerce Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 2, 1937
65 P.2d 440 (Okla. 1937)

Opinion

No. 27684.

January 26, 1937. Rehearing Denied March 2, 1937.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Dismissal of Appeal Prosecuted for Delay Only.

In a second appeal from an order refusing to vacate a judgment, where it appears that the appeal is without merit, and for delay only, the same will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Dewey County; W.P. Keen, Judge.

Action by the Commerce Trust Company against John F. Haffner et al. to foreclose mortgage. From an order refusing to vacate a judgment, defendant appeals. Dismissed.

I.H. Lookabaugh and Theo C. Knoop, for plaintiffs in error.

Cohoon Heiple, for defendant in error.


This is a second appeal from an order refusing to vacate a judgment in foreclosure proceedings. The land has been sold and a writ of assistance issued. The original judgment was entered upon stipulation of the attorneys for the parties, and the stipulation agreeing to wait eight months from the date thereof was liberally adhered to on the part of the plaintiff. In fact, 19 additional days were given the defendants. We find nothing in the second motion to vacate not contained in the first motion or which could not have been considered by the court at that time. We have carefully checked the record, and are of the opinion that the appeal is without merit and taken for delay only.

The appeal is dismissed.

OSBORN, C. J., BAYLESS, V. C. J., and BUSBY, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Haffner v. Commerce Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 2, 1937
65 P.2d 440 (Okla. 1937)
Case details for

Haffner v. Commerce Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:HAFFNER et al. v. COMMERCE TRUST CO

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 2, 1937

Citations

65 P.2d 440 (Okla. 1937)
65 P.2d 440

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Stephens

All three appeals involve the right to possession of a three-foot strip of land in block 7, Berryhart…

Sabin v. Levorsen

Where from an examination of the record and the briefs of plaintiff in error, it is conclusively shown that…