Haer v. Graves

1 Citing case

  1. Shapiro Bros. v. Jones-Festus Prop

    205 S.W.3d 270 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 15 times
    Holding public's use of a shopping center's parking lot to patronize stores located on the property and as a shortcut between adjacent streets was insufficient to prove dedication

    We disagree. Shapiro Brothers relies on Haer v. Graves, 649 S.W.2d 246 (Mo.App.W.D. 1983) to essentially reargue Point III. Citing Haer for the proposition that a claim of right acquired by an individual and other members of the public defeats any charge of trespass, Shapiro Brothers contends that it too defeated any trespass charge. Haer, 649 S.W.2d at 247.