From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hadnot v. Lufkin Indep. Sch. Dist.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Jun 30, 2023
No. 12-23-00144-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2023)

Opinion

12-23-00144-CV

06-30-2023

MICKEY M. HADNOT, APPELLANT v. LUFKIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, APPELLEE


APPEAL FROM THE 159TH DISTRICT COURT ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay--at the time an item is presented for filing--whatever fees are required by statute or Texas Supreme Court order. TEX. R. APP. P. 5; see TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. An appellate court may enforce Rule 5 by any order that is just. TEX. R. APP. P. 5. After giving ten days' notice, an appellate court may dismiss an appeal because the appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

On May 31, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant, Mickey Hadnot, that the filing fee in this appeal is due and that the appeal would be subject to dismissal if the fee was not paid on or before June 12. The date for remitting the filing fee passed, and Appellant has not paid the fee or otherwise shown that he is excused from paying the fee.

The case information sheet from the Angelina County District Clerk's office reflects that Appellant was not declare indigent in the trial court.

Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

We also note that Appellant has not filed the required docketing statement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. NOR DOES APPELLANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL COMPLY WITH APPELLATE RULE 9.5 OR SECTION 51.017(A) OF THE TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5 (SERVICE); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. &REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(A) (WEST SUPP. 2019) (NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST BE SERVED ON EACH COURT REPORTER RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING REPORTER'S RECORD).

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.


Summaries of

Hadnot v. Lufkin Indep. Sch. Dist.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Jun 30, 2023
No. 12-23-00144-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Hadnot v. Lufkin Indep. Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:MICKEY M. HADNOT, APPELLANT v. LUFKIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler

Date published: Jun 30, 2023

Citations

No. 12-23-00144-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2023)