From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haddad v. Fed. Express Corp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 20, 2024
CV 23-8539-KK-MRWx (C.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-8539-KK-MRWx

02-20-2024

Alex Haddad v. Federal Express Corporation, et al.


Present: The Honorable KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [Dkt. 19]

On May 15, 2023, Plaintiff Alex Haddad (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in Los Angeles County Superior Court. Dkt. 1-1, Ex. A. On October 6, 2023, defendant Protective Insurance Company filed a Notice of Removal. Dkt. 1. On December 29, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand (“Motion”) this action to Los Angeles County Superior Court with a hearing on the Motion set for March 7, 2024. Dkt. 19. No opposition has been filed. The Court, thus, deems the failure to oppose as consent to granting the Motion. Local Rule 7-12.

Accordingly, GOOD CAUSE HAVING SHOWN, the Court thus GRANTS the Motion, and the matter is REMANDED to Los Angeles County Superior Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Haddad v. Fed. Express Corp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 20, 2024
CV 23-8539-KK-MRWx (C.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Haddad v. Fed. Express Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Alex Haddad v. Federal Express Corporation, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 20, 2024

Citations

CV 23-8539-KK-MRWx (C.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2024)