From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hackney v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 15, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0282 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0282 GGH P

04-15-2013

DUANE ROBERT HACKNEY, Petitioner, v. D. PARAMO, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner has filed a motion for summary judgment, regarding an alleged due process violation in the imposition of restitution in conjunction with his conviction. Petitioner is informed that this issue was raised in his habeas petition and will be decided when his habeas petition is decided.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's March 29, 2013 motion for summary judgment, (dkt. no. 9), is denied without prejudice to a later ruling.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hackney v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 15, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0282 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Hackney v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:DUANE ROBERT HACKNEY, Petitioner, v. D. PARAMO, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 15, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0282 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2013)