From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hackney v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 14, 2013
1:13-cv-0215-SAB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2013)

Opinion

1:13-cv-0215-SAB (HC)

02-14-2013

DUANE ROBERT HACKNEY, Petitioner, v. D. PARAMO Respondent.


ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

The petitioner is challenging a conviction from Sacramento County, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the Sacramento Division.

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Sacramento Division.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Sacramento; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200

Sacramento, CA 95814
IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hackney v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 14, 2013
1:13-cv-0215-SAB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Hackney v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:DUANE ROBERT HACKNEY, Petitioner, v. D. PARAMO Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 14, 2013

Citations

1:13-cv-0215-SAB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2013)