From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Habig v. McAllister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2013
Case No.: 2:10-cv-02022 LKK-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:10-cv-02022 LKK-EFB P

03-27-2013

DAVID HABIG, Plaintiff, v. W. McALLISTER, et al., Defendants.

Kathleen M. Kerekes Kerekes Law Corporation Attorneys for Plaintiff, DAVID HABIG


Kathleen M. Kerekes
Kerekes Law Corporation
Attorneys for Plaintiff, DAVID HABIG

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE

STIPULATION FOR DIMISSAL

[FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

On March 25, 2013 the parties, by and through their counsels of record, submitted a Stipulation for Dismissal to dismiss the above-entitled matter in its entirety as to all claims and all Defendants pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). All parties who have appeared in this action have stipulated to the dismissal. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Clerk is directed to close the case and and all pending matters before this Court as to the above-entitled action are hereby taken off calendar as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Habig v. McAllister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2013
Case No.: 2:10-cv-02022 LKK-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Habig v. McAllister

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HABIG, Plaintiff, v. W. McALLISTER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:10-cv-02022 LKK-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2013)