Opinion
No. 09-CV-8336 CBM(PLA)
10-17-2011
HAAS AUTOMATION INC., PLAINTIFF, v. BRIAN DENNY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
JUDGMENT
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
That, in accordance with the jury verdict, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Haas Automation, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and against Defendant Brian Denny on Plaintiffs' claim that Defendant Denny registered five domain names in violation of the Anti-Cybersquatting Protection Act ("ACPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d). Plaintiff is awarded $5,000 in statutory damages against Defendant Denny, which is $1,000 per domain name found by the jury to violate the ACPA;
That, in accordance with the jury verdict, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Denny and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs' claim that Denny registered the remaining ten domain names in violation of the ACPA;
That, in accordance with the jury verdict, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant CNCPros.net and against Plaintiff on Plaintiff's ACPA claim; and That, pursuant to Plaintiff's motions to dismiss, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Automated Solutions, Inc. dba ASI Machine & Supply and against Plaintiff on all claims;
That, pursuant to Plaintiff's motions to dismiss, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Denny and CNCPros.net and against Plaintiff on Plaintiff's claims for Federal Trademark and Service Mark Infringement, False Designation in Interstate Commerce, and Unfair Business Practices under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200;
That, pursuant to the Court's Order Granting in Part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, judge is entered in favor of all Defendants on Plaintiff's claim under California's False Advertising Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CONSUELO B. MARSHALL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE