From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GUZMAN v. HOUK

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 20, 2006
Case No. 2:04-cv-194 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 20, 2006)

Summary

addressing merits of federal claim raised in motion to withdraw guilty plea

Summary of this case from Beavers v. Franklin Cnty. Adult Prob.

Opinion

Case No. 2:04-cv-194.

April 20, 2006


OPINION AND ORDER


On March 24, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. Petitioner has objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner objects to all of the Magistrate Judge's conclusions and recommendations. Petitioner again raises all of the same arguments that were previously presented.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation objected to by petitioner. For the reasons discussed at length in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court overrules petitioner's objections.

The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. This case is DISMISSED.

Petitioner's request for oral argument is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

GUZMAN v. HOUK

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 20, 2006
Case No. 2:04-cv-194 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 20, 2006)

addressing merits of federal claim raised in motion to withdraw guilty plea

Summary of this case from Beavers v. Franklin Cnty. Adult Prob.
Case details for

GUZMAN v. HOUK

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTO S. GUZMAN, Petitioner, v. MARC HOUK, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 20, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:04-cv-194 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 20, 2006)

Citing Cases

Horton v. Warden, Noble Corr. Inst.

Dunn v. Bell, No. 2:06-cv-14918, 2006 WL 3206125 (E.D.Mich. Nov.6, 2006) ("There is no federal constitutional…

Beavers v. Franklin Cnty. Adult Prob.

This Court has jurisdiction to consider this underlying federal claim. See Gibson, 2011 WL 1429099, at *6…