From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guzman v. Cnty. of Orange

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 9, 2022
SA CV 21-01425-JVS (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2022)

Opinion

SA CV 21-01425-JVS (DFM)

08-09-2022

Antonin Guzman v. County of Orange, et al.


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Honorable Douglas F. McCormick, United States Magistrate Judge

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

On June 7, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint with leave to amend. See Dkt. 21. Plaintiff was instructed to elect one of the following options within thirty-five (35) days: voluntarily dismiss the case without prejudice, stand on the complaint, or file an amended complaint. See id. at 18. Plaintiff was told that failure to act could result in a recommendation of dismissal for failure to prosecute. See id. at 19.

Two months have passed, and Plaintiff has not filed anything. It is Plaintiffs responsibility to move this case toward completion. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause within twenty-one (21) days as to why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider Plaintiffs fifing of the Notice of Election form (attached to the dismissal Order) or an amended complaint as a satisfactory response. Failure to respond will result in a recommendation of dismissal.


Summaries of

Guzman v. Cnty. of Orange

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 9, 2022
SA CV 21-01425-JVS (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Guzman v. Cnty. of Orange

Case Details

Full title:Antonin Guzman v. County of Orange, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 9, 2022

Citations

SA CV 21-01425-JVS (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2022)