From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guy v. Furman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 12, 1956
4 Misc. 2d 564 (N.Y. App. Term 1956)

Opinion

January 12, 1956

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, HERMAN C. STOUTE, J.

David L. Minkoff for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.


This proceeding should have been dismissed for failure to give the notice required by section 53 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations (see Frankel v. Rost, 272 App. Div. 334). But, in any event, such dismissal was surely required upon tenant's cross motion to set aside the final order in landlord's favor, when uncontradicted documentary proof was presented that landlord had accepted rent between the time of said notice and the commencement of the proceeding. Subdivision 8 of section 1410 of the Civil Practice Act, authorizing landlord to accept rent without prejudice to a holdover proceeding, applies only after it has been commenced.

The final order and order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, with costs.

Concur: HOFSTADTER, EDER and HECHT, JR., JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Guy v. Furman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 12, 1956
4 Misc. 2d 564 (N.Y. App. Term 1956)
Case details for

Guy v. Furman

Case Details

Full title:ADRIA GUY, Respondent, v. MARY FURMAN, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 12, 1956

Citations

4 Misc. 2d 564 (N.Y. App. Term 1956)
148 N.Y.S.2d 555

Citing Cases

Scarborough Manor Owners Corp. v. Robson

For instance, in 92 Bergenbrooklyn, LLC v. Cisarano, 50 Misc.3d 21, 21 N.Y.S.3d 810 (App.Term, 2d Dept., 2d,…

Roxborough Apartment Corporation v. Becker

It is well settled in this Department that a landlord's acceptance of a tenant's rent after the tenancy is…