From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gutierrez v. Smith

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 18, 2023
2:23-cv-00712-KJM-JDP (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00712-KJM-JDP 2:23-cv-00920-KJM-JDP

10-18-2023

JESUS GUTIERREZ, JR., Petitioner, v. OAK SMITH, ACTING WARDEN SAN QUENTIN STATE Prison, California, Respondent. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest. CHRISTOPHER VANNING JOHNSON Petitioner, v. TRENT ALLEN, WARDEN, SALINAS VALLEY STATE PRISON, SOLEDAD CALIFORNIA, Respondent. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest.

Law Offices of Beles & Beles Robert J. Beles Paul McCarthy Bar Jesus Gutierrez, Jr. and Christopher Vanning Johnson


Law Offices of Beles & Beles Robert J. Beles

Paul McCarthy Bar

Jesus Gutierrez, Jr. and Christopher Vanning Johnson

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING 32 DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE AND REPLY MEMORANDUM

JEREMY D. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

(Unopposed)

Good cause appearing, and the motion being unopposed, this court grants petitioners a 32 day extension of time to file the traverse and reply memorandum, from Thursday, October 19, 2023, to and including Monday, November 20, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gutierrez v. Smith

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 18, 2023
2:23-cv-00712-KJM-JDP (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Gutierrez v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:JESUS GUTIERREZ, JR., Petitioner, v. OAK SMITH, Acting Warden San Quentin…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 18, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00712-KJM-JDP (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2023)