Opinion
No. 10-3832-cv.
June 17, 2011.
Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Weinstein, J.).
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.
Adam J. Fishbein, Adam J. Fishbein, P.C., Cedarhurst, NY, for Appellant.
David M. Schultz (Todd P. Stelter, on the brief), Hinshaw Culbertson, Chicago, IL, for Appellees.
PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, RALPH K. WINTER, B.D. PARKER, Circuit Judges.
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellant Angeles Gutierrez ("Gutierrez") appeals from the judgement of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Weinstein, J.) dated August 27, 2010, dismissing Gutierrez's complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.
"We review de novo the grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under [Fed.R.Civ.P.] 12(b)(6)." Harris v. Mills, 572 F.3d 66, 71 (2d Cir. 2009). We consider the legal sufficiency of the complaint, taking its factual allegations to be true and drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiffs favor. See id.
Having conducted a de novo review of the record in light of these principles, we affirm the judgment below for substantially the same reasons stated by the District Court in its decision, which is as well-reasoned as it is brief.
We have considered all of Gutierrez's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.