From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gutierrez v. Butler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 25, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2684 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2008)

Summary

finding time to exhaust administrative remedies to have coexisted with the two-year tolling for the disability of imprisonment but not to have extended the limitations period

Summary of this case from Lopez v. Schwarzenegger

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2684 LKK EFB P.

March 25, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 14, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 14, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant's July 5, 2007, motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. This action is dismissed as untimely.


Summaries of

Gutierrez v. Butler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 25, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2684 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2008)

finding time to exhaust administrative remedies to have coexisted with the two-year tolling for the disability of imprisonment but not to have extended the limitations period

Summary of this case from Lopez v. Schwarzenegger

refusing to extend the limitations period for the four months during which the incarcerated prisoner was exhausting administrative remedies because that period "was subsumed by the longer, two-year statutorily-created disability for his imprisonment"

Summary of this case from Pedroza v. Pham

refusing to extend the limitations period for the four months during which the incarcerated prisoner was exhausting administrative remedies because that period "was subsumed by the longer, two-year statutorily-created disability for his imprisonment."

Summary of this case from Givens v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco
Case details for

Gutierrez v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:JOE GUTIERREZ, Plaintiff, v. D.K. BUTLER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 25, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2684 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2008)

Citing Cases

Reece v. Basi

Whether the exhaustion period is properly excluded from computation of the deadline is far from clear,…

Pedroza v. Pham

A number of courts have followed Rose and declined to tack disabilities. See Givens v. City and County of San…