From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gutierrez v. Asset Mgmt. Specialist, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Mar 21, 2013
Case No. 1:13-CV-00149-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13-CV-00149-LJO-GSA

03-21-2013

JESUS GUTIERREZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiff, v. ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC., a Nevada corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

Jeremy T. Naftel, State Bar No. 185215 Joel Van Parys, State Bar No. 227387 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP Attorneys for Defendant ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC. Daniel F. Gaines, State Bar No. 251488 Alex P. Katofsky, State Bar No. 202754 GAINES & GAINES, APLC Attorneys for Plaintiff JESUS GUTIERREZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public


Jeremy T. Naftel, State Bar No. 185215
Joel Van Parys, State Bar No. 227387
CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC.
Daniel F. Gaines, State Bar No. 251488
Alex P. Katofsky, State Bar No. 202754
GAINES & GAINES, APLC
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JESUS GUTIERREZ, on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE AND DEADLINE TO

SUBMIT JOINT SCHEDULING

REPORT

It is hereby stipulated between the parties, through their counsel of record, as follows:

1. On January 31, 2013 this Court ordered the parties to appear for a mandatory scheduling conference. The Court also ordered the parties to submit a joint scheduling report one week before the scheduling conference.

2. The parties have been conducting informal discovery and have agreed to participate in a mediation. The parties are finalizing a mediation date in mid to late May, 2013.

3. Because the parties have participated in informal discovery and agreed to mediate the case, and in the interest of saving time and expense for the parties and the Court, they jointly request that the Court order: (1) that the status conference currently set for April 2, 2013 be continued to a date no earlier than June 3 and no later than June 27, 2013 and (2) that the date to submit a Joint Status Report be continued to the date 7 days prior to the new status conference.

CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP

Joel Van Parys

By: _______________

Joel Van Parys

Attorneys for Defendant

ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC.

GAINES & GAINES, APLC

By: _______________

Daniel F. Gaines

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JESUS GUTIERREZ, on behalf of himself and all others

similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public

ORDER

In light of the parties' stipulation, the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for April 2, 2013, is continued to June 12, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. The joint scheduling report shall be filed one week prior to the conference. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Gutierrez v. Asset Mgmt. Specialist, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Mar 21, 2013
Case No. 1:13-CV-00149-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Gutierrez v. Asset Mgmt. Specialist, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JESUS GUTIERREZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:13-CV-00149-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)