From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gurvey v. Acosta

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 11, 2018
160 A.D.3d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2018–01366

04-11-2018

In the Matter of Amy R. GURVEY, petitioner, v. Rolando T. ACOSTA, etc., respondent.

Amy R. Gurvey, Upper Montclair, N.J., petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondent.


Amy R. Gurvey, Upper Montclair, N.J., petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondent.

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, HECTOR D. LASALLE, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENTProceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Honorable Rolando T. Acosta, the Presiding Justice of the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, to direct the Chief Attorney of the First Department Attorney Grievance Committee to produce to her certain documents. By decision and order on motion dated January 23, 2018, the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, transferred the proceeding to this Court. Motion by the petitioner, inter alia, for an order directing the respondent to vacate all orders entered by the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, since 2008 in proceedings involving the petitioner.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter ofLegal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v. Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16, 439 N.Y.S.2d 882, 422 N.E.2d 542 ).

The petitioner has failed to establish a clear legal right to the relief sought.

LEVENTHAL, J.P., MILLER, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gurvey v. Acosta

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 11, 2018
160 A.D.3d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Gurvey v. Acosta

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Amy R. GURVEY, petitioner, v. Rolando T. ACOSTA, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 11, 2018

Citations

160 A.D.3d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
71 N.Y.S.3d 387