Opinion
No. 79275
08-08-2019
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to dismiss two cases. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, C.J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Pickering /s/_________, J.
Hardesty cc: Hon. David S. Gibson, Jr., District Judge
Jason Gunn
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk