From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gunn v. Gibson

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 8, 2019
No. 79275 (Nev. Aug. 8, 2019)

Opinion

No. 79275

08-08-2019

JASON GUNN, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE DAVID S. GIBSON, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, DEPT. L, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to dismiss two cases. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Pickering /s/_________, J.
Hardesty cc: Hon. David S. Gibson, Jr., District Judge

Jason Gunn

Attorney General/Carson City

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Gunn v. Gibson

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 8, 2019
No. 79275 (Nev. Aug. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Gunn v. Gibson

Case Details

Full title:JASON GUNN, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE DAVID S. GIBSON, JR., DISTRICT…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 8, 2019

Citations

No. 79275 (Nev. Aug. 8, 2019)