From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guines v. Miss. Dept. of Corrs.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division
Nov 2, 2021
4:19CV80-DAS (N.D. Miss. Nov. 2, 2021)

Opinion

4:19CV80-DAS

11-02-2021

JONATHAN GUINES PLAINTIFF v. MISS. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS DR. GLORIA PERRY CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HONEYCUTT DEFENDANTS


FINAL JUDGMENT

DAVID A. SANDERS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this day:

(1) The plaintiff's claims regarding denial of adequate medical care are DISMISSED with prejudice because: (a) the defendants are cloaked with qualified immunity, and (b) the allegations fail to state a valid constitutional claim;

(2) In addition, the plaintiff's claims against defendant Honeycutt regarding failure to protect are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies;

(3) The instant case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, counting as a “STRIKE” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and

(4) This case is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Guines v. Miss. Dept. of Corrs.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division
Nov 2, 2021
4:19CV80-DAS (N.D. Miss. Nov. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Guines v. Miss. Dept. of Corrs.

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN GUINES PLAINTIFF v. MISS. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS DR. GLORIA PERRY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division

Date published: Nov 2, 2021

Citations

4:19CV80-DAS (N.D. Miss. Nov. 2, 2021)