From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guillory v. Bhutia

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 29, 2023
2:21-cv-0462 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0462 WBS AC P

09-29-2023

ANTHONY GUILLORY, Plaintiff, v. TSHERING BHUTIA, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO OPT OUT OF POST-SCREENING EARLY ADR

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On September 29, 2023, Defendants T. Flores and T. Bhutia filed a motion to opt out of Post-Screening Early ADR. ECF No. 29. After reviewing the motion, filed concurrently with the declaration of counsel in support thereof, the Court finds good cause to grant the request.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion to opt out (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED;
2. The stay of this action is LIFTED, and
3. Defendants shall have thirty days from the date of this order to file a responsive pleading.


Summaries of

Guillory v. Bhutia

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 29, 2023
2:21-cv-0462 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2023)
Case details for

Guillory v. Bhutia

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY GUILLORY, Plaintiff, v. TSHERING BHUTIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 29, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-0462 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2023)