Opinion
No. 18-70158
12-21-2018
ANTONIO GUILLEN-ESTRADA, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, Respondent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Agency No. A029-638-020 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Antonio Guillen-Estrada, a native and citizen of Mexican, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and review de novo questions of law, including claims of due process violations. Singh v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2004). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Guillen-Estrada's motion to reopen where he failed to establish prima facie eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, or relief under the Convention Against Torture. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010) (the BIA can deny a motion to reopen for failure to establish prima facie eligibility for the relief sought); Bolshakov v. I.N.S., 133 F.3d 1279, 1280-81 (9th Cir. 1998) (denying a motion to reopen despite extortionist demands). We reject Guillen-Estrada's contention that his due process rights were violated, Vargas-Hernandez v. Gonzales, 497 F.3d 919, 926-27 (9th Cir. 2007), and we reject his contention that the BIA engaged in improper fact finding.
Guillen-Estrada's motion to file a late reply brief is granted.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.