From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gueye v. Bridges

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jul 20, 2010
Case No. 1:08-cv-334 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 20, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08-cv-334.

July 20, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations filed June 18 and 21, 2010 (Docs. 38, 39 40).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are hereby ADOPTED. Defendants Media Bridges, Tom Bishop, Keith Gilbert and Leon Montgomerys' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Defendants Greater Cincinnati Foundation and Federal Communications Commissioners' motions to dismiss are GRANTED.


Summaries of

Gueye v. Bridges

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jul 20, 2010
Case No. 1:08-cv-334 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Gueye v. Bridges

Case Details

Full title:Amar Gueye, Plaintiff v. Media Bridges, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jul 20, 2010

Citations

Case No. 1:08-cv-334 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 20, 2010)