From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guevara v. Richardson

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 15, 2024
22-cv-04759-RFL (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-04759-RFL (PR)

02-15-2024

MICHAEL GUEVARA, Plaintiff, v. D. RICHARDSON, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

DKT. NOS. 18 AND 19

RITA F. LIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Mail sent by the Court to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days ago. (Dkt. No. 32.) Accordingly, this federal civil rights suit is DISMISSED (without prejudice) because plaintiff failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and because he failed to prosecute this matter, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the suit and have proceedings reinstated. Any motion to reopen must have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page.

All pending motions are DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate Dkt. Nos. 18 and 19, enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Guevara v. Richardson

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 15, 2024
22-cv-04759-RFL (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Guevara v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL GUEVARA, Plaintiff, v. D. RICHARDSON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 15, 2024

Citations

22-cv-04759-RFL (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2024)