From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guerrero-Martinez v. Warden

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 7, 2024
CV 24-00210-DOC (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-00210-DOC (DFM)

06-07-2024

EDUARDO GABRIEL GUERRERO-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. No objections were filed, and the time to file objections has expired. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition without prejudice as moot and for failure to prosecute.

As a federal prisoner proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Petitioner is not required to obtain a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in order to appeal to the United States Court of Appeals in this case. See Harrison v. Ollison, 519 F.3d 952, 958 (9th Cir. 2008) (holding that plain language of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) does not require federal prisoners bringing § 2241 petitions to obtain COA to appeal, unless § 2241 petition “is merely a ‘disguised' § 2255 petition”).


Summaries of

Guerrero-Martinez v. Warden

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 7, 2024
CV 24-00210-DOC (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Guerrero-Martinez v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:EDUARDO GABRIEL GUERRERO-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 7, 2024

Citations

CV 24-00210-DOC (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2024)